џWPC< ћџ2 ZBœ0cџџHP LaserJet IIIDHPPCL5MSXЯОІ P7ћXP‚ЋXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P 7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P 7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P 7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P 7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P 7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P 7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P!7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXXЯОІ P"7ћXP(АР`  Z (CG Times RegularXћџ22:3|xа АА` А аŠааб XЯОІ P7ћ бСр ь СУ УTelephone Survey Research: ƒ Ср ь%СAn OverviewФ Фƒ Ср ь$СKaren A. Conklinƒ Ср ьСMarket & Survey Research Analystƒ Ср ьСOffice of Institutional Researchƒ Ср ьСJohnson County Community Collegeƒ Ср ь!С12345 College Boulevardƒ Ср ьСOverland Park, KS 66210Љ1299ƒ Ср ь%С(913) 469Љ8500ƒ Ср ьСRunning Head: Telephone Surveysƒ а АААX аеаЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаСJ и'>СTelephone Surveysƒ еа Ш аСр ь'СУ УAbstractФ Фƒ аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџмџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџЬаС м СThe rise to prominence of surveys by telephone has been attributed to advances in telephone technology, improvement of telephone research procedures, near complete accessibility of any population via the telephone, expansion of a survey industry that requires quality data generated in an efficient and timely manner for eager clients, and availability of considerable information, based on experiment and experience, on what techniques work or do not work when doing telephone surveys. This paper details 10 years of experience with telephone survey methodology utilized to collect data from business and industry, former students, and individuals residing in the collegeРРs service area. С м СOf particular interest to researchers are the results of comparisons between mail survey respondents and nonrespondents who were later telephoned for an interview. These comparisons were conducted on results of annual studies of the collegeРРs career program completers. Although nonrespondents tended to be younger and more often male than female, there were no notable differences in the level of success and satisfaction reported. У У Ф ФСр ьСУ УTelephone Survey Research: An Overviewƒ IntroductionФ Ф С м СIn the history of survey research, no other technical or procedural innovation, with the exception of the computer, has made as significant an impact on this type of data gathering as the telephone. The telephone survey is one of the dominant and most popular survey techniques in use today. Most commercial and some academic survey research, whether it be national, regional, or local, is conducted by telephone. This is the result of improved sampling and interviewing techniques, enhanced quality control, and the availability of a larger pool of information on what works or does not work when interviewing by telephone (Frey, 1989).С м СTelephone surveys provide fast, reliable data and afford an unprecedented opportunity to control the integrity of the sample as the study progresses. It is thus not surprising that telephone survey methodology has achieved a respected status as a means of gathering information to aid effective decision making in both the public and private sectors. Despite the higher cost of telephone surveys, the telephone survey approach is to be preferred over the mail survey approach inasmuch as it yields a higher response rate and is the only approach that allows those administering it to clarify its general intent and to elaborate on specific survey items as soon as questions arise (Michigan, 1981). У УIdentifying the PopulationФ Ф С м СWhenever a telephone survey project is initiated, the first order of business should always be to determine exactly who should be surveyed and where to secure accurate names and phone numbers for that group. This phase of the project is easily completed when the project involves students or former students for whom accurate information is presumed to be available in the collegeРРs database. Identifying the population to be surveyed is clearly more of a challenge when the general public or employers are involved. In many instances, purchased lists are the most viable option and cost in the neighborhood of $300 to $500. These lists can be custom ordered as a random sample stratified by age, gender, ethnicity, ZIP code, size of firm, type of firm, or by a variety of other variables to meet the criteria for the project. У УSamplingФ Ф С м СTwo common methods for sampling a population are the standard random sample and the random number dialing scheme. The standard random sample is generally produced either through a computer program designed to generate a random sample from an existing database, or by going through a listing such as a telephone book and selecting every Р РnthРР individual, beginning from some randomly selected starting point. The random number dialing system is simply thatЉЉdialing a series of numbers at random utilizing a predetermined set of telephone prefixes within the service area being sampled. Computer programs are usually employed to generate the random number to be dialed. С м СSeveral factors should be borne in mind when conducting a telephone survey utilizing a standard random sample. More and more individuals are opting for unlisted telephone numbers, excluding them from the pool of potential respondents. Others have multiple access lines coming into the same household, thus exhibiting a greater probability of being sampled than the more typical household with only one access line. Still others have no telephone in the home, although there is some doubt that this group is either large enough or differs substantially enough from the general population to warrant special consideration. At least one study found that on many attitudinal questions those in households without telephones as a group did not differ to any great extent from the rest of the population as a whole (Lavrakas, 1987). С м СCaution also should be exercised when a random number dialing scheme is used for sampling because of the greater probability of multiple access households being sampled than the more typical household with only one access line. Surveys conducted by the Northwestern University Survey Laboratory in the Chicago metropolitan area in the midЉ1980's consistently found 12% to 15% of households reporting more than one telephone number, which corresponded closely with Illinois Bell estimates (Lavrakos, 1987). Unquestionably the percent is much greater now, considering the growing popularity of separate telephone lines to accommodate modems for home computers. Another problem in efficient utilization of random number dialing is the large and growing number of households with FAX machines, as they increase costs due to the time and effort expended in eliminating them from the process. У УDesigning the Telephone SurveyФ Ф С м СAny good survey is a major research project, involving considerable time and resources. To make sure your efforts pay off, it is crucial that you spend some time planning (Suskie, 1992). Designing any survey is a matter of style, but following standardized procedures will prevent an excessive compromise of data quality in the name of research artistry. Questions to be addressed should include, Р РWhat are the objectives of your survey?РР (what do you hope to gain as a result of this project?); Р РWhat do you really УУneedФФ to know (get rid of the Р Рnice to knowРР stuff); Р РHow will the results be used?РР (in other words, what are you going to do with the dataЉЉif unsure, perhaps you need to revisit the Р Рneed to knowРР question); Р РHow will you analyze and report the data?РР; and Р РHow much will the project cost?РР С м СThe format for telephone surveys differs considerably from other types of surveys, and attention to the details of telephone survey design enable the interviewers to conduct each interview in as efficient and professional a manner as possible. Telephone interviews should always begin with an introductory statement by the caller explaining who they are and who they represent, the purpose of the study, the confidentiality of the data, and how long the interview should take. When appropriate, a disclaimer should also be read explaining that no one will try to sell the respondents anything as a result of their participation in the study. С м СAny qualifying questions should follow the introduction, and naturally depend on the study guidelines. б XЯОІ P7ћ бSome examples of items that are often used to qualify potential respondentsб XЯОІ P7ћ б are the year their program was completed at the college or how long the respondent has been a resident of the area. Clearly if the study is aimed at eliciting responses only from completers for a specific academic year, or only from residents who have been in the area for 5 years or more, for example, the interview with an individual not meeting those guidelines must be terminated. When doing so, it is appropriate to provide an explanation of why they are being eliminated as potential respondents and an expression of appreciation for their time.Œб XЯОІ P7ћ бС м СThe first questions on a telephone survey set the tone for the remainder of the interview. Thus, they should flow comfortably from the introductory remarks and build from simple to complex in nature. The first questions should establish the Р Рrapport effectРР (Frey 1989) where the respondent begins to feel a sense of trust in the interview situation and a willingness to cooperate to the fullest and most truthful extent. Dillman (1978) suggests that the first question be a closed item relevant to the topic, interesting, and easy to follow. The second question may then be openЉended, allowing the respondent to express a view and to find his or her Р Рtelephone voice.РР As with all survey design, questions of a sensitive nature (like those requesting demographic data) should be introduced last.б XЯОІ P7ћ б С м СBecause the telephone survey is designed to be read, special instructions to interviewers should be easily recognizable. One effective means of accomplishing this is to type instructions in bolded capital letters, underlined and enclosed in parentheses or a box. This helps the interviewer to avoid the embarrassment of reading items not meant for the respondent. Another design feature proven to be most helpful to telephone interviewers is a column indicating the skip pattern for the questions. Inserting a broken line between entries calls immediate attention to the fact that a skip may be required (see Example 1). б XЯОІ P7ћ бС м СNaturally, any newly designed telephone survey should be fieldЉtested to check the flow of the questions, the appropriateness of the instructions to interviewers, and the time required to complete an interview. This is easily accomplished by calling a few friends and administering the survey to them over the telephone.б XЯОІ P7ћ б ааУ УExample 1Ф Ф ггаЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџќ!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаУ УСJ Ќ&HСФ Фƒ УУаЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџS : ќ!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаС SСQUESTIONС -СRESPONSEС <СCODEС : DСSPСJ ъ$HСФФƒ аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм… ќ!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџЬаС м С1.С СWas JCCC your first choice when youС 0СYesС =С1С … EС3 аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџмЄќ!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџЬаС м СС Сdecided to attend college to pursueС 0СС =СС ЄCСЉ Љ Љ Љ Љ аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџм… ќ!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџЬаС м СС Сthis major?С 0СNoС =С2С … EС2 аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџќ!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаУУСJ Ќ&HСƒ ФФаЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџмќ!џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаС м С2.С СWhich college was your first choice? С м СУ УУУ(RECORD ACTUAL RESPONSE)ФФФ Ф УУС м СС ССJ Ќ&HСФФƒ С м С3.С СHow many semesters were you enrolled С м СС СУУin that programФФ at the community С м СС Сcollege? С м СУ УУУ(RECORD ACTUAL RESPONSE)ФФФ Ф УУааС м СС ССJ Ќ&HСФФƒ С м СPrint telephone surveys on both sides of standard 20# white paper in a manner that allows the questions on the front of each page to be read first. Upon reaching the end of the series of questions on the front of the pages, the interviewer then turns over the entire survey at once to continue the sequence of questions printed on the backs of the pages.У У Ф ФThis method negates the necessity of turning over page after page as the interview progresses, and has proven beneficial in assisting the caller in keeping his or her place as the interview progresses. It provides a considerable savings in the sheer weight and volume of the surveys compared to printing on heavier paper, one side only, and facilitates transportation of the blank surveys to the offices of the interview team and then bringing completed surveys back to the college. It also conserves space for the period of time after publication of the final report that completed surveys are retained for documentation purposes.ŒУ УMethodologyФ Ф С м СTelephone surveys can be used as a single method of collecting data, in conjunction with a mail survey to reach a larger group of potential respondents with less cost than the telephone survey alone, or as a follow up to mail surveys to substantially boost response rates. The nature of the project should determine which methodology is appropriate. С м СAn example of a project in which telephone methodology was used exclusively is the collegeРРs community perception study which was conducted in 1987 and again in 1992. In each of these studies, a list was purchased of a random sample of 2,000 county residents over age 18, twice the number with whom completed interviews were anticipated. The list was stratified by ZIP code to insure inclusion of a reasonable number of respondents from outlying areas. As the study progressed, the integrity of the sample was maintained by substituting a new resident from the same ZIP code for each inaccessible individual. Inaccessibility resulted from a disconnected or incorrect telephone number, or simply from the inability to reach the individual at home despite calls initiated at different times of the day over a oneЉweek period. С м СA telephone survey in conjunction with a mail survey was used successfully for a Business and Industry Institute needs assessment conducted in 1992. In this instance, the purchased list consisted of all area firms with 50 or more employees, a random sample of one in three firms with 11Љ50 employees, and a random sample of one in ten firms with ten or fewer employees. All 426 firms with 50 or more employees and approximately half of the sample of 471 firms employing 11 to 50 workers were telephoned. The remaining firms with 11 to 50 employees and all 573 in the sample of firms with fewer than 11 employees were mailed surveys. ŒС м СOf interest is the fact that although a total of 582 businesses responded to the study, only 67 completed mail surveys. Clearly had telephone surveys not been utilized, the data would have been very limited. Despite the poor response rate for the mail surveys, it was not considered a wasted effort due to its marketing value. Specifically, the survey brought the numerous possibilities for classes and customized training available through the collegeб XЯОІ P7ћ б to the attention of various employees of the firms receiving it.б XЯОІ P 7ћ б С м СConducting telephone interviews as a follow up of nonrespondents to mail surveys is the third means by which telephone surveys have enhanced the collegeРРs research efforts. The college has been conducting followЉup studies of career program completers throughout its 28 year history, and by far the best response rates have been in recent years since the initiation of the use of a telephone follow up of nonrespondents to the mail surveys. У УMail/Telephone ComparisonsФ Ф С м С б XЯОІ P 7ћ бOf particular interest to researchers are results of comparisons between mail survey respondents and nonrespondents who were later telephoned for an interview. These comparisons were derived from results of annual followЉup studies of the collegeРРs career program completers and б XЯОІ P 7ћ бcollected over time to enhance the reliability of the findings. б XЯОІ P 7ћ б Females and older completers were consistently more likely to return mail surveys than males and younger completers. What was somewhat of a surprise (and most gratifying) were the comparisons pertaining to completersРР successЉЉthe percent employed in related jobs and the average hourly wage of those working fullЉtime in a related job. Year after year, essentially no difference was foundб XЯОІ P 7ћ б on either of these variablesб XЯОІ P7ћ б between initial mail respondents and nonrespondents who completed the telephone version of the survey (see Table 1). Ср ь"СУ У____________________ƒ ааСр ь%СInsert Table 1ƒ ааСр ь"С____________________Ф Фƒ С м СAnother question these comparisons answered was whether there were any substantial differences between initial mail respondents and nonrespondents who were telephoned in terms of the percent who indicated satisfaction with their fullЉtime related job and with the college. Clearly, those who were telephoned were at least as satisfied as those who responded to the original mail survey. Due to space limitations, findings on satisfaction with the college are presented for the class of 1994Љ95 onlyЉЉthe most recent study for which data were available (see Table 2). Ср ь"СУ У____________________ƒ ааСр ь%СInsert Table 2ƒ ааСр ь"С____________________Ф Фƒ С м СNote that when differences were evident in job success (based on the percent working in a related job andб XЯОІ P7ћ б their average hourly wage) or inб XЯОІ P7ћ б respondentsРР satisfaction with their job and college experiences, generally a greater percent of nonrespondents who were telephoned than initial mail survey respondents were successful and satisfied.б XЯОІ P7ћ б У УTelephone Survey CostsФ Ф С м СCost is always a factor when determining appropriate methodology for any project, and telephone surveys are expensive. Clearly the project will be less expensive if the calling could be done Р РinЉhouseРР, but unfortunately most colleges and universities have neither the staff nor the facilities for successfully completing this task. Even in situations where sufficient staff are available, problems may arise due to utilizing callers unskilled in the fine points of telephone survey work. Therefore, if telephone survey methodology is to be employed, in most cases an outside firm will need to be hired to do all or part of the work involved. С м СThere are three facets to telephone researchЉЉtechnical services, field services, and professional services. Most responses to telephone surveys are entered directly into the computer these days, and technical service personnel write the computer programs and extract the data. Field services people conduct the actual telephone interviews, and professional services personnel write the reports and may also design the survey and make a presentation of findings, complete with charts and various other visual aids. С м СAs a general rule of thumb,б XЯОІ P7ћ б in the Midwestб XЯОІ P7ћ б for just technical and field services you can expect to pay approximately $1 per minute for each completed survey, or $8 to $10 for a typical 8 to 10 minute interview, including some long distance. These costs will be higher in Florida, Texas, or on either coast (closer to $1.25 per minute), and may be somewhat lower in the South. If no long distance is involved, the cost drops by approximately 10 cents a minute. The number of completed surveys required is a strong determinant of the total cost since the Р Рup frontРР work is most often the same. Expect the cost per completed survey to decrease as the number of potential responses increases. С м СThe cost of technical services can be eliminated if you choose to have the data from telephone interviews entered on a paper survey, but this necessitates having someone do data entry for you. If you contract for the technical services but wish to economize by not utilizing an outside firmРРs professional services, you will receive your data on a disk and then must design your own survey and either do the analysis and report writing yourself or assign these tasks to someone else at your institution. С м СComputerЉdriven telephone interviews are a wonderful use of technology, but tend to be inappropriate and unduly expensive if the survey you design requires a substantial number of verbatim comments or involves information the interviewer will need to look up to determine a code, such as, Р РWhich college was your first choice?РР. б XЯОІ P7ћ бWriting out comments or looking up codes after terminating the call inflates б XЯОІ P7ћ бthe average cost by approximately $1.00Љ$1.25 per survey for each minute the interviewer must spend accomplishing these tasks. С м СIn the Midwest, costs for professional services can run anywhere from about $600 for a Р Рtop lineРР report (very basic results or printouts) to $10,000 or more for a Р РfullРР report which may include designing the survey and providing a presentation of results, complete with visual aids and nicely bound copies of results. In between these two possibilities is the Р РexecutiveРР report. Again, costs will be higher in Florida, Texas, or on either coast and slightly lower in the South. С м СThe college has chosen to continue utilizing the paper telephone survey after one rather disastrous experience with computerized survey administration. Thus, the survey design, data entry, analysis, and report writing for all of the collegeРРs telephone survey work is completed inЉhouse. The low bid received by the college in summer of 1996 for field work only, based on completing approximately 700 interviews of 8 to 12 minutes each with JCCC shortЉ and longЉterm career program completers was $8.21 per survey. У УTraining the (Professional) InterviewersФ Ф С м СIt is imperative that all interviewers be adequately trained in telephone survey techniques during an orientation session prior to initiation of the study. Regardless of the experience of the interview team, basic instructions should be reviewed, such as the necessity of reading all questions exactly as stated with no paraphrasing, remaining neutral and avoiding any positive or negative feedback, writing down all verbatim comments exactly as stated, sitting up straight and smiling so the voice reflects interest and regard for the respondent, and completing the call record appropriately. С м СDuring the orientation, the entire survey should be reviewed in detail to insure that every interviewer is intimately familiar with the qualifying questions, the instructions to callers which are УУnotФФ to be read aloud, the skip patterns, and the manner in which every question is to be read. The most efficient way to do this is to have the interviewers take turns participating in a mock interview as you go through every item on the telephone survey. This method familiarizes the interviewers with the survey instrument, gives them an opportunity to ask questions about the study, and helps them with any problems they may encounter with pronunciation of some of the words and phrases contained in the survey. С м СIt is highly recommended that spot checks be conducted throughout the interview process, and especially at the very beginning. Completed surveys should be picked up a day or two after the telephoning has begun and calls made to a few randomly selected respondents to be sure the interviews had been conducted in an efficient, professional manner. This step is particularly important when using the services of a market research firm with which you are unfamiliar. Be especially cautious about hiring a firm that contracts out the calling to individuals working out of their homes. It is immensely tempting for these interviewers to complete surveys without making the actual calls in order to maximize their production. Your spot check shortly after the project begins and throughout the course of the study should uncover any such problems У УConclusionsФ Ф С м Сб XЯОІ P7ћ бTelephone surveys are effective toolsб XЯОІ P7ћ б to substantially enhance response rates while providing fast, reliable data and the opportunity to control the integrity of the sample as the study progresses.б XЯОІ P7ћ б However, they are expensive. Basically, three things will govern the ultimate success of any telephone research project: the accuracy of the list of potential respondents, the design of the telephone survey, and the expertise of the telephone interviewers. In other words, quality data is the result of asking the right people the right questions in the right way. ItРРs as simple as that. У У ReferencesФ Ф Dillman, Don A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: С м СJohn Wiley. Frey, J. (1989). Survey research by telephone: Second edition. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE С м СPublications, Inc. Groves, R., & Kahn, M. (1979). Surveys by telephone: A national comparison with personal С м Сinterviews. New York: Academic Press. Lavrakas, P. (1987). Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection, and supervision. Newbury С м СPark, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Michigan State Dept. of Education (1981). 1981 employer followЉup survey of 1980 completers С м Сand leavers. (ERIC Document No. ED 250509). Suskie, L. (1992). Questionnaire survey research: What works. Tallahassee, FL: Association С м Сfor Institutional Research. У УTable 1 УУInitial Mail vs. FollowЉup Telephone Responses:ФФ УУQuestions Pertaining to Job SuccessФ ФФФ УУаЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаСJ и'KСФФƒ аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџD(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџЬаааItemС D/СMail б XЯОІ P7ћ бResponsesб XЯОІ P7ћ бСJ и'<СTelephone Responsesƒ аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаУУааСJ и'KСФФƒ Percent Employed in Related Job аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџмчя(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ2ЬаС м СClass of 1994Љ95СB —3С78ƒ.9%СB Ÿ$BС83ƒ.2% С м СClass of 1993Љ94СB —3С78ƒ.1СB Ÿ$BС83ƒ.9 С м СClass of 1992Љ93СB —3С85ƒ.2СB Ÿ$BС80ƒ.8 С м СClass of 1991Љ92СB —3С75ƒ.2СB Ÿ$BС83ƒ.1 С м СClass of 1990Љ91СB —3С78ƒ.2СB Ÿ$BС73ƒ.0 Average Hourly WageУУ1ФФ С м СClass of 1994Љ95СB —2С$12ƒ.63СB Ÿ$AС$12ƒ.45 С м СClass of 1993Љ94СB —3С12ƒ.55СB Ÿ$BС11ƒ.95 С м СClass of 1992Љ93СB —3С11ƒ.87СB Ÿ$BС11ƒ.86 С м СClass of 1991Љ92СB —3С11ƒ.42СB Ÿ$BС11ƒ.50 С м СClass of 1990Љ91СB —3С11ƒ.07СB Ÿ$BС11ƒ.06 аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаУУСJ и'KСФФƒ аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџž(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаУУб XЯОІ P7ћ бNoteФФ.С СУУ1ФФТžТResults detail responses for respondents employed in a fullЉtime related job only.б XЯОІ P7ћ б а€аУ УTable 2 б XЯОІ P7ћ бУУInitial Mail vs. FollowЉup Telephone ResponsesФФ: УУQuestions Pertaining to SatisfactionФ ФФФ УУаЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаСJ и'KСФФƒ аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџD(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџЬаааItemС D/СMail б XЯОІ P7ћ бResponsesб XЯОІ P7ћ бСJ и'<СTelephone Responsesƒ аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаУУааСJ и'KСФФƒ б XЯОІ P 7ћ бSatisfaction With JobУУ1, 2ФФ аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџмчя(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ2ЬаС м СClass of 1994Љ95СB —3С59ƒ.0%СB Ÿ$BС76ƒ.5% С м СClass of 1993Љ94СB —3С83ƒ.3СB Ÿ$BС83ƒ.1 С м СClass of 1992Љ93СB —3С79ƒ.5СB Ÿ$BС91ƒ.1 С м СClass of 1991Љ92СB —3С64ƒ.3СB Ÿ$BС77ƒ.1 С м СClass of 1990Љ91СB —3С75ƒ.3СB Ÿ$BС93ƒ.6 Satisfaction with JCCC: Class of 1994Љ95 С м СJCCC First Choice to AttendСB —3С90ƒ.3%СB Ÿ$BС92ƒ.6% С м СWould Attend JCCC AgainСB —3С91ƒ.2СB Ÿ$BС95ƒ.4 С м СWould Recommend JCCC to FriendsСB —3С96ƒ.0СB Ÿ$BС96ƒ.5 С м СWould Encourage Own Children to С м С Attend JCCCСB —3С80ƒ.6СB Ÿ$BС89ƒ.8 б XЯОІ P!7ћ бУУаЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаСJ и'KСƒ аЬџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџž(#џџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџџ ЬаNoteФФ.С СУУ1ФФТžТResults detail responses for those employed in a fullЉtime related job only. С СУУ2ФФТžТData were collected utilizing a 5Љpoint scale ranging from very satisfied to very dissatisfied. Thus, the Р РsatisfiedРР data include Р Рvery satisfiedРР and Р Рsomewhat satisfiedРР responses combined.б XЯОІ P"7ћ б